{"id":1263,"date":"2018-06-02T15:48:27","date_gmt":"2018-06-02T15:48:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.andcouldheplay.com\/?p=1263"},"modified":"2018-06-02T15:48:27","modified_gmt":"2018-06-02T15:48:27","slug":"why-twitters-good-bad-for-football","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.andcouldheplay.com\/why-twitters-good-bad-for-football\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Twitter\u2019s Good\/Bad For Football"},"content":{"rendered":"

Why Twitter\u2019s Good\/Bad For Football<\/h1>\n

Football has always suffered from tribalism. Since a ball was first kicked and those watching wanted one team to win over another, there have been those that have taken their favouritism too far. Sometimes football is simply used as an excuse for people to behave in a way that is despicable. Hooliganism is a good example of that. You will never convinced me that people who head to a match in order to behave violently towards the opposition are genuine football fans. I remember watching England lose to Germany in the quarter-finals of the World Cup in 2010 in a bar in London. When my friend and I left, we walked past a large crowd of people smashing the windows of the Haagen-Dazs shop in Leicester square, dragging the flag off the flagpole and setting fire to it. Let\u2019s ignore the fact that the ice-cream was invented in the Bronx and that the name was a tribute to Denmark’s excellent treatment of its Jewish community in the Second World War for a moment, that\u2019s still not how real football fans react to losses.<\/p>\n

\n

No wonder why no one gives a fuck about that white club called West Ham. Retard fans who are hooligans in part time and full on deluded the other time. Imagine th audacity of wanting Martial plus Rashford and cash for the bum Arnatuovic 🖕🤣🤣<\/p>\n

\u2014 Kshitij Garg (@gargkshitij17) 2 June 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n