{"id":2386,"date":"2023-08-07T12:52:04","date_gmt":"2023-08-07T12:52:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.andcouldheplay.com\/?p=2386"},"modified":"2023-08-07T12:52:04","modified_gmt":"2023-08-07T12:52:04","slug":"why-havent-liverpool-signed-more-players","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.andcouldheplay.com\/why-havent-liverpool-signed-more-players\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Haven\u2019t Liverpool Signed More Players?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The big news in the football world this weekend is that referees are adding long periods of added time to the end of each half in a big to combat time-wasting. It means we\u2019ve seen the likes of seven, eight and nine minutes of stoppage time played each half, with some players booked for the act of wasting time. The football supporting world should be rejoicing, given the fact that our hard-earned cash has previously been being spent on games that aren\u2019t lasting anywhere near the 90 minutes that they should be, all so that the likes of Newcastle United can waste time and disrupt the opposition\u2019s rhythm. I personally am not so sure that this new directive is doing what we should actually want it to do, however. That isn\u2019t to say that I don\u2019t think that football matches should be the length of time that they\u2019re meant to be as I absolutely do. It is more that the teams know exactly what it is that they\u2019re doing when they waste time, which is usually done as much to disrupt the rhythm of the other team as it is to get the match called to a conclusion early.<\/p>\n

\n

Have to say adding on 25 minutes of added time to every game instead of just actually booking players for timewasting is a brilliant gimmick<\/p>\n

\u2014 cam (@1805cam) August 7, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n